 |

 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
I posted the picture of my paintings on MySpace and for my surprise one of them was missing and look what I got on my inbox:
Datum: 19 jun 2009, 20:32 Titel: We had to delete one of your photos Tekst: We had to remove an image (or images) from your account because they violated our Terms of Use. Our site is for people as young as 13, so we can't have certain kinds of pics (nude/sexually explicit, violence). Find out more about content we don 19t allow at http://www.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseact ion=misc.terms. If you continue to violate our Terms, we may be forced to remove your account. If you find an image which you feel is in violation of our Terms, please feel free to use the 'report image' link below the image. Thanks for your understanding. MySpace Safety & Security
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |


 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 Since a couple of days ago some friends were sending a link to me Cats outsmarted in psychologist's test Strings experiment shows limits of feline intelligenceIt will cause outrage among some cat owners, but research suggests the pets are not as clever as some humans assumed 13 or at least they think in a way we have yet to fathom.Psychology lecturer Britta Osthaus says cats do not understand cause-and-effect connections between objects. She tested the thought processes of 15 of them by attaching fish and biscuit treats to one end of a piece of string, placing them under a plastic screen to make them unreachable and then seeing if the cats could work out that pulling on the other end of the string would pull the treat closer.They were tested in three ways, using a single baited string, two parallel strings where only one was baited, and two crossed strings where only one was baited.The single string test proved no problem, but unlike dogs (which Osthaus has previously tested) no cat consistently chose correctly between two parallel strings. With two crossed strings, one cat always made the wrong choice and others succeeded no more than might be expected by chance.Osthaus, of Canterbury Christ Church University, Kent, said: "This finding is somehow surprising as cats regularly use their paws and claws to pull things towards them during play and hunting. They performed even worse than dogs, which can at least solve the parallel string task."The study helped show the limits of feline intelligence, said Osthaus, who conducted the research while a teaching fellow at Exeter University. "If we know their limits we won't expect too much of them, which in turn is important for their welfare. I am not trying to say cats are stupid, just they are different. We are so anthropomorphic we can't see the world through their eyes."There is just one consolation. Humans don't understand string theory either.On the red letters they say that dogs performed better than cats, but if you visit the website of the researcher.On the site of the researcher you you only see articles about dogs and all them say that dogs also didn't solve the problem. An article about my research in The Guardian, UK national newspaper, 27th December 2002: MacLeod, D.: Man's best friend is not so clever. Osthaus, B., Lea, S.E.G. & Slater, A.M. (2005). Dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) fail to show understanding of means-end connections in a string-pulling task. Animal Cognition, 8(1), 37-47. Dogs do not understand means-end connections via a string. Talk given at the Comparative Cognition Conference, Florida, USA, March 2003. In 2002 the guardian also published it Man's best friend is not so cleverOn the website of the university where she works I found the same article about cats. With a little less sensationalist title Expert's research shows cats don't understand string theory
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |

|
 |
|
 |